Grief counselling efficacy
What have we learned?
Keywords:
Grief counselling, efficacy, effectiveness, outcomes, psychotherapyAbstract
AbstractThe growing debate within the bereavement field about the efficacy of grief counselling offers two contrasting viewpoints. At one extreme is Neimeyer's claim that ‘such interventions are typically ineffective, and perhaps even deleterious, at least for persons experiencing a normal bereavement’. At the other is the more cautiously optimistic position of Larson and Hoyt, who argue that studies of grief counselling as typically practised demonstrate levels of effectiveness similar to those found for traditional psychotherapy, and that there is no empirical evidence to support claims of harmful effects. This article summarises the key findings and claims in this debate, explores factors that might have contributed to an uncritical acceptance of the claim that grief counselling is harmful, and recapitulates the authors’ view that the empirical data on outcomes from grief counselling give cause for cautious optimism.
References
Allumbaugh, DL and Hoyt, WT. 1999. Effectiveness of grief counseling: a meta-analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 46(3): 370–380.
Anderson, AS. 1988. Does psychotherapy make some clients worse? A re-analysis of the evidence for treatment-induced deterioration, Memphis, TN: University of Memphis.
Begley, S. 2007. Get shrunk at your own risk. Newsweek, 149(24): 49
Bonanno, GA and Lilienfeld, SO. 2008. Let's be realistic: when grief counseling is effective and when it's not. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 39(3): 377–378.
Campbell, DT. 1986/1989. “Sociology of scientific validity”. In Social experimentation, Edited by: Campbell, DT and Russo, MJ. 179–202. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Center for Advancement of Health 2003 . Report on bereavement and grief research . Washington, DC : Center for Advancement of Health .
Currier, JM, Holland, JM and Neimeyer, RA. 2007. The effectiveness of bereavement interventions with children: a meta-analytic review of controlled outcome research. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 36(2): 253–259.
Currier, JM, Neimeyer, RA and Berman, JS. 2008. The effectiveness of psychotherapeutic interventions for the bereaved: a comprehensive quantitative review. Psychological Bulletin, 34(5): 648–661.
Fortner, BV. 1999. The effectiveness of grief counseling and therapy: a quantitative review, Memphis, TN: University of Memphis.
Fortner, BV. 2008. Stemming the TIDE: a correction of Fortner (1999) and a clarification of Larson and Hoyt (2007). Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 39(3): 379–380.
Hoyt, WT and Larson, DG. 2008. A realistic approach to drawing conclusions from the scientific literature: response to Bonanno and Lilienfeld (2008). Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 39(3): 378–379.
Larson, DG and Hoyt, WT. 2007a. What has become of grief counseling? An evaluation of the empirical foundations of the new pessimism. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 38(4): 347–355.
Larson, DG and Hoyt, WT. 2007b. “The bright side of grief counseling: deconstructing the new pessimism”. In Living with grief: before and after the death, Edited by: Doka, KJ. 157–174. Washington, DC: Hospice Foundation of America.
Neimeyer, RA. 2000. Searching for the meaning of meaning: grief therapy and the process of reconstruction. Death Studies, 24: 541–558.
Petty, RE and Cacioppo, JT. 1986. Communication and persuasion: central and peripheral routes to attitude change, New York: Springer-Verlag.
Stroebe, M., Hansson, RO, Schut, H and Stroebe, W. 2008. “Bereavement research: 21st-century prospects”. In Handbook of bereavement research and practice: advances in theory and intervention, Edited by: Stroebe, MS, Hansson, RO and Stroebe, W. 577–603. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Weller, AC. 2001. Editorial peer review: its strengths and weaknesses, Medford, NJ: Information Today.
