What have we learned from research on grief counselling?

A response to Schut and Neimeyer

Authors

  • William T Hoyt
  • Dale G Larson

Keywords:

Grief counselling, bereavement support, outcomes, effectiveness, meta-analysis

Abstract

Abstract

Dale Larson and William Hoyt respond to Robert Neimeyer and Henk Schut's articles in this issue. They argue that Neimeyer and Schut's more pessimistic conclusions about the effectiveness of bereavement counselling are drawn from large meta-analyses of many different approaches, with different populations, recruited in a range of different ways at different times following bereavement, and followed up over different periods of time. They restate their assertion that we should continue to be cautious about accepting unquestioningly such generalised findings based on broad-brush inclusion criteria as the research in fact provides more grounds for optimism than these meta-analyses suggest.

References

Allumbaugh, DL and Hoyt, WT. 1999. Effectiveness of grief counselling: a meta-analysis. Journal of Counselling Psychology, 46(3): 370–380.

Begley S 18 June 2007 . Get shrunk at your own risk . Newsweek [online]. Available from : http://www.newsweek.com/id/34105 [accessed 12 November 2009] .

Center for Advancement of Health 2003 . Report on bereavement and grief research . Washington, DC : Center for Advancement of Health .

Currier, JM, Neimeyer, RA and Berman, JS. 2008. The effectiveness of psychotherapeutic interventions for the bereaved: a comprehensive quantitative review. Psychological Bulletin, 134: 648–661.

Fortner, BV. 1999. The effectiveness of grief counselling and therapy: a quantitative review, Memphis, TN: The University of Memphis.

Hoyt, WT and Larson, DG. 2008. A realistic approach to drawing conclusions from the scientific literature: response to Bonanno and Lilienfeld (2007). Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 39: 378–379.

Larson, DG and Hoyt, WT. 2007. What has become of grief counselling: an evaluation of the empirical foundations of the new pessimism. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 38: 347–355.

Larson, DG and Hoyt, WT. 2009. Grief counselling efficacy: what have we learned?. Bereavement Care, 28(3): 14–19.

Neimeyer, RA. 2000. Searching for the meaning of meaning: grief therapy and the process of reconstruction. Death Studies, 24: 541–558.

Neimeyer, RA. 2010. Grief counselling and therapy: the case for humility. Bereavement Care, 29(1): 4–7.

Schut, H. 2010. Grief counselling efficacy: have we learned enough?. Bereavement Care, 29(1): 8–9.

Schut, H, Stroebe, MS, Van Den Bout, J and Terheggen, M. 2001. “The efficacy of bereavement interventions: determining who benefits”. In Handbook of bereavement research: consequences, coping and care, Edited by: Stroebe, MS, Hansson, RO, Stroebe, W and Schut, H. 705–737. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Downloads

Published

2010-04-01

Issue

Section

Original Articles