Death of a partner
Financial implications and experience of loss
Keywords:
Bereavement, financial implications, coping, psychosocial support, dual process modelAbstract
AbstractLittle research has been done to explore the financial implications of bereavement, or how experience of economic change affects grief. This article discusses key findings from a study conducted in the UK of the financial implications of the death of a partner. Many participants experienced considerable change in their financial situation following the death of their partner, and many perceived themselves to be worse off. Dealing with financial issues occupied a considerable amount of time and could take an immense emotional toll, adding to the distress of the bereavement. An important conclusion is that practical and emotional responses to economic changes following a death are closely intertwined, and that palliative care and bereavement services are well-placed to understand and address this, and offer appropriate help and support.
References
Bechelet, L and Boultwood, E. 2001. Welfare and benefit issues affecting people with terminal illness. Palliative Care Today, 101: 10–11.
Bechelet, L, Heal, RLeam, C. 2008. Empowering carers to reconstruct their finances. Practice: Social Work in Action, 20: 223–234.
Brazier, L, Frumkin, LLitster, J. 2009. Your money matters evaluation: money management for older people, London: Help the Aged.
Carr, D and Utz, R. 2002. Late-life widowhood in the United States: new directions in theory and research. Ageing International, 27: 65–88.
Corden, A and Hirst, M. 2008. Implementing a mixed methods approach to explore the financial implications of death of a life partner. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2: 208–220.
Corden A Hirst M Nice K 2008 Financial implications of death of a partner York Social Policy Research Unit, University of York Available from: http://php.york.ac.uk/inst/spru/pubs/1148/ [accessed 19 November 2009]
Department of Health 2008 End of life care strategy. promoting high quality care for all adults at the end of life London Department of Health
Gallagher D 2004 Finances In: D Oliviere B Monroe Death, dying, and social differences Oxford Oxford University Press chap 11
Gentry, J, Kennedy, PPaul, C. 1995. Family transitions during grief: discontinuities in household consumption patterns. Journal of Business Research, 34: 67–79.
Goldberg, D and Williams, P. 1991. A user's guide to the General Health Questionnaire, Windsor: NFER-Nelson.
Keene, J and Prokos, A. 2008. Widowhood and the end of spousal care-giving: relief or wear and tear?. Ageing and Society, 28: 551–570.
Levy, J and Payne, M. 2006. Welfare rights advocacy in a specialist health and social care setting: a service audit. British Journal of Social Work, 36: 323–331.
Parkes, C. 1996. Bereavement: studies of grief in adult life, (3rd ed), London: Routledge.
Ritchie J Lewis J et al. 2003 Qualitative research practice London Sage
Small, N. 2001. Social work and palliative care. British Journal of Social Work, 31: 961–971.
Steinhauser, K, Christakis, NClipp, E. 2000. Factors considered important at the end of life by patients, family, physicians, and other care providers. Journal of American Medical Association, 284: 2476–2482.
Stroebe, M, Folkman, SHansson, R. 2006. The prediction of bereavement outcome: development of an integrative risk factor framework. Social Science and Medicine, 63: 2440–2451.
Stroebe, M and Schut, H. 1999. The dual process model of coping with bereavement: rationale and description. Death Studies, 23: 197–224.
Stroebe, M, Schut, H and Stroebe, W. 2007. Health outcomes of bereavement. The Lancet, 370: 1960–1973.
Umberson, D, Wortman, C and Kessler, R. 1992. Widowhood and depression: explaining long-term gender differences in vulnerability. Journal of Health and Social Behaviour, 33: 10–24.
Varney, D. 2006. Service transformation: a better service for citizens and businesses, a better deal for the taxpayer, London: The Stationery Office.
