Grief counselling and therapy

The case for hope

Authors

  • Robert A Neimeyer

Keywords:

Grief counselling, grief therapy, attachment theory, meaning reconstruction, complicated grief

Abstract

Grief counselling and therapy are in a period of ferment as emerging claims and models are developed that challenge our assumptions about how people accommodate loss and how counsellors and therapists can best help them to do so. This article reviews recent developments in bereavement research and practice that studies show are effective in helping bereaved people who are struggling to rebuild their lives following loss.

References

Boelen, PA, van den Hout, M and van den Bout, J. 2006. A cognitive- behavioral conceptualization of complicated grief. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 13(2): 109–128.

Boelen, PA, de Keijser, J, van den Hout, MA and van den Bout, J. 2007. Treatment of complicated grief: a comparison between cognitive- behavioral therapy and supportive counselling. Journal of Clinical and Consulting Psychology, 75: 277–284.

Bonanno, GA. 2004. Loss, trauma and human resilience. American Psychologist, 59: 20–28.

Bonanno, GA, Wortman, CB and Nesse, RM. 2004. Prospective patterns of resilience and maladjustment during widowhood. Psychology and Aging, 19: 260–271.

Bowlby, J. 1980. Attachment and loss. Vol 3: Loss, sadness and depression, New York: Basic Books.

Caserta, MS and Lund, DA. 2007. Toward the development of an Inventory of Daily Widowed Life (IDWL): guided by the dual process model of coping with bereavement. Death Studies, 31: 505–535.

Currier, JM, Holland, JM and Neimeyer, RA. 2006. Sense making, grief and the experience of violent loss: toward a mediational model. Death Studies, 30: 403–428.

Currier, JM, Holland, JM and Neimeyer, RA. 2010. Do CBT interventions alleviate distress following bereavement? A review of the current evidence. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy, 3: 79–95.

Currier, JM, Neimeyer, RA and Berman, JS. 2008. The effectiveness of psychotherapeutic interventions for the bereaved: a comprehensive quantitative review. Psychological Bulletin, 134: 648–661.

Field, NP, Gao, B and Paderna, L. 2005. Continuing bonds in bereavement: an attachment theory based perspective. Death Studies, 29: 277–299.

Holland, JM, Neimeyer, RA, Boelen, PA and Prigerson, HG. 2009. The underlying structure of grief: a taxometric investigation of prolonged and normal reactions to loss. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 31: 190–201.

Keesee, NJ, Currier, JM and Neimeyer, RA. 2008. Predictors of grief following the death of one's child: the contribution of finding meaning. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 64: 1145–1163.

Kissane, DW and Bloch, S. 2002. Family focused grief therapy, Buckingham, , UK: Open University Press.

Kissane, DW, McKenzie, M, Block, S, Moskowitz, C, McKenzie, DP and O'Neill, I. 2006. Family focused grief therapy: a randomized, controlled trial in palliative care and bereavement. American Journal of Psychiatry, 163: 1208–1218.

Lichtenthal WG Cruess DG 2010 Effects of directed written disclosure on grief and distress symptoms among bereaved individuals Death Studies 34 in press

Neimeyer RA 2001 Meaning reconstruction and the experience of loss Washington, DC American Psychological Association

Neimeyer, RA. 2006. “Re-storying loss: fostering growth in the posttraumatic narrative”. In Handbook of posttraumatic growth: research and practice, Edited by: Calhoun, L and Tedeschi, RG. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Neimeyer, RA and Currier, JM. 2009. Grief therapy: evidence of efficacy and emerging directions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(6): 352–356.

Neimeyer, RA and Gamino, L. 2006. “The experience of grief and bereavement”. In Handbook of death and dying, Edited by: Bryant, C. 847–854. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Neimeyer, R A, Hogan, N and Laurie, A. 2008. “The measurement of grief: psychometric considerations in the assessment of reactions to bereavement”. In Handbook of bereavement research, Edited by: Stroebe, M, Hansson, ROSchut, H. 133–186. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Neimeyer, RA, van Dyke, JG and Pennebaker, JW. 2009. “Narrative medicine: writing through bereavement”. In Handbook of psychiatry in palliative medicine, Edited by: Chochinov, H and Breitbart, W. 454–469. New York: Oxford.

Park, CL. 2008. Testing the meaning-making model of coping with loss. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 27: 970–994.

Parkes, CM and Prigerson, H. 2009. Bereavement, 4th ed, London & New York: Routledge.

Prigerson, HG, Horowitz, M.JJacobs, SC. 2010. Prolonged grief disorder: psychometric validation of criteria proposed for DSM-V and ICD-11. PLoS Medicine, 6: 1–12.

Rubin, S. 1999. The two-track model of bereavement: overview, retrospect and prospect. Death Studies, 23: 681–714.

Rubin, SS, Malkinson, R, Koren, D and Michaeli, E. 2009. The two-track model of bereavement questionnaire (TTBQ): development and validation of a relational measure. Death Studies, 33: 305–333.

Shear, K, Frank, E, Houch, PR and Reynolds, CF. 2005. Treatment of complicated grief: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 293: 2601–2608.

Stroebe M Hansson R Schut H Stroebe W 2008 Handbook of bereavement research: advances in theory and intervention Washington, DC American Psychological Association

Stroebe, M and Schut, H. 1999. The dual process model of coping with bereavement: rationale and description. Death Studies, 23: 197–224.

Wagner, B, Knaevelsrud, C and Maercker, A. 2006. Internet-based cognitive- behavioral therapy for complicated grief: a randomized controlled trial. Death Studies, 30: 429–453.

Wortman, CB and Silver, R. 2001. “The myths of coping with loss revisited”. In Handbook of bereavement research: consequences, coping and care, Edited by: Stroebe, M, Hansson, R, Stroebe, W and Schut, H. 405–430. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Downloads

Published

2010-07-01

Issue

Section

Original Articles