Mapping evaluation of UK childhood bereavement services
Findings from a recent study
Keywords:
Childhood bereavement services evaluation, outcomes, outputs, evaluation toolsAbstract
AbstractThis article reports a study of evaluation strategies and tools currently used within UK child bereavement services. Data were sought from a representative sample of services across the UK on the evaluations’ users, the data requested, and organisations' existing evaluation strategies. The study found that child bereavement services were struggling with a considerable burden of demand for information from a range of users – chiefly funders and commissioners of services. However, a mapping exercise revealed that a considerable amount of the data required by evaluation users was the same, and that it was being obtained from evaluations that services overall were already undertaking. The most common forms of evaluation were post-intervention user satisfaction surveys of core interventions, using self-completion questionnaires. However, collection of basic data was limited and patchy, and evaluations of outcomes and organisational processes and reporting on the findings were less common. Based on these findings, the researchers propose the development of a set of common evaluation tools that could be used across all child bereavement services.
References
Christ, GH, Raveis, V, Siegel, K and Karus, D. 2005. Evaluation of a preventive intervention for bereaved children. Journal of Social Work in End of Life and Palliative Care, 1(3): 57–81.
Currier, JM, Holland, JM and Neimeyer, RA. 2007. The effectiveness of bereavement interventions with children: a meta-analytic review of controlled outcome research. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 36(2): 253–259.
Eedle S 2003 . Evaluation . CBN Bulletin 5 [online] . London : National Children's Bureau . Available from: apenny@ncb.org.uk
Ellis, J. 2009. The case for an outcomes focus, London: Charities Evaluation Service.
Heady, L and Oliveira, A. 2008. On the bright side: developing a questionnaire for charities to measure children's well-being, London: New Philanthropy Capital.
HM Treasury 2003 . Every child matters . London : Stationery Offfice .
Hoggarth, L and Comfort, H. 2010. A practical guide to outcome evaluation, London: Jessica Kingsley.
National CAMHS Review 2008 . Children and young people in mind [online] . London : National CAMHS Review . Available from: http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/@dh/@en/documents/digitalasset/dh_090398.pdf [accessed 10 August 2010] .
Øvretveit, OJ. 1998. Evaluating health interventions, Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Rolls, L. 2007. Mapping evaluations of childhood bereavement services: final report to the Clara Burgess Charity, Cheltenham: University of Gloucestershire.
Rolls, L. 2011. Challenges in evaluating childhood bereavement services: the theoretical and practical issues. Bereavement Care, 30(1): 10–15.
Rolls, L and Payne, S. 2003. Childhood bereavement services: a survey of UK provision. Palliative Medicine, 17: 423–432.
Rolls, L and Payne, S. 2004. Childhood bereavement services: issues in UK provision. Mortality, 9(4): 300–328.
Rolls, L and Payne, S. 2007. Children and young people's experiences of UK childhood bereavement services. Mortality, 12(3): 281–303.
Rosner, R, Krause, J and Hagl, M. 2010. A meta-analysis of interventions for bereaved children and adolescents. Death Studies, 34: 99–136.
Sandler, I, Wolchik, S, Ayers, T, Tein, Y-J, Coxe, S and Chow, W. 2008. “Linking theory and intervention to promote resilience in parentally bereaved children”. In Handbook of bereavement research and practice: advances in theory and intervention, Edited by: Stroebe, M, Hansson, R, Schut, H and Stroebe, W. 531–550. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Stokes, J. 2004. Then, now and always. Supporting bereaved children as they journey through grief: a guide for professionals, Cheltenham: Winston's Wish.
Stokes, J, Wyer, S and Crossley, D. 1997. The challenge of evaluating a child bereavement programme. Palliative Medicine, 11: 179–190.
