Identifying levels of vulnerability in grief using the Adult Attitude to Grief scale: from theory to practice
Keywords:
Range of Response to Loss, Adult Attitude to Grief scale, vulnerability, resilience, outcome measuresAbstract
AbstractA key challenge for service providers and practitioners in the field of bereavement is to match clients’ varied needs with equally diverse approaches to care. In order to provide these appropriate and effective interventions, it is crucial to have a reliable means of assessing levels of vulnerability in bereaved clients. The Range of Response to Loss model (RRL) and Adult Attitude to Grief scale (AAG) have evolved as practice tools able to profile the variable nature of client grief by identifying the initially instinctive reactions to loss alongside more aware coping responses. This paper describes the theoretical concepts which underpin the AAG, and recent research which confirms the factor structure of the scale and its capacity to identify varied levels of vulnerability. The application of the AAG to practice as an assessment/ outcome tool and guide to intervention are set out and future developments such as potential inclusion in the CORE IMS discussed.
References
Agnew A, Manktelow R, Taylor BJ, Jones L (2009). Bereavement needs assessment in specialist palliative care: a review of the literature. Palliative Medicine 24 46–59.
Ainsworth MDS, Blehar MC, Waters E, Wall S (1978). Patterns of attachment: a psychological study of the strange situation. Hillsdale NJ Erlbaum.
Angus L, Hardke K (1994). Narrative processes in psychotherapy. Canadian Psychology 35 190–203.
Attig T (2011). How we grieve: relearning the world (revised edn). New York: Oxford University Press.
Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M et al (1961). An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry 4 561–71.
Berne E (1961). Transactional analysis in psychotherapy. New York: Grove Press.
Bonanno GA (2004). Loss, trauma, and human resilience: have we underestimated the human capacity to thrive after extremely aversive events? American Psychologist 59(1) 20–28.
Bowlby J (1980). Attachment and loss: Vol. 3 Loss: Sadness and Depression. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Cleiren M (1991). Bereavement and adaptation: a comparative study of the aftermath of death. Washington: Hemisphere Publishing.
Cooper M, Mcleod J (2011). Pluralistic counselling and psychotherapy. London: Sage.
Cruse Bereavement Care, Bereavement Services Association (2014). Bereavement Care Service Standards. Available at http:www.cruse.org.uk/BCSS [accessed 22 May 2015].
Dallos R (2006). Attachment narrative therapy. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Ellis A (1962). Reason and emotion in psychotherapy. Secaucus, NJ: Lyle Stuart.
Greene R (2002). Holocaust survivors: a study in resilience. Journal of Gerontological Social Work 37 3–18.
Horowitz M (1997). Stress response syndromes. Northvale, NJ: Aronson.
Horowitz M, Wilner N, Alvarez W (1979). Impact of Events Scale: a measure of subjective stress. Psychosomatic Medicine 41 209–18.
Joseph S, Linley PA (2006). Positive therapy. Hove: Routledge.
Kroenke K, Spitzer RL (2002). The PHQ-9: A new depression and diagnostic severity measure. Psychiatric Annals 32 509–521.
Kübler-Ross E (1970). On death and dying. London: Tavistock.
Machin L (2001). Exploring a framework for understanding the range of response to loss; a study of clients receiving bereavement counselling. Unpublished PhD thesis: Keele University, UK.
Machin L (2007). The Adult Attitude to Grief Scale as a tool of practice for counsellors working with bereaved people. A study report sponsored by Age Concern, Tameside and Keele University.
Machin L (2014). Working with loss and grief: a theoretical and practical approach (2nd edn). London: Sage.
Machin L, Spall R (2004). Mapping grief: a study in practice using a quantitative and qualitative approach to exploring and addressing the range of response to loss. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research 4 9–17.
Martin TL, Doka KL (2000). Men don't cry … women do. Philadelphia: Brunner/Mazel.
McLeod J (2003). An introduction to counselling. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Neenan M (2009). Developing resilience – a cognitive-behavioural approach. London: Routledge.
Neimeyer RA, Sands DC (2011). Meaning reconstruction in bereavement. In RA Neimeyer, DL Harris, HR Winokuer and GF Thornton (eds). Grief and bereavement in contemporary society. New York: Routledge. 9–22.
Parkes CM (2014). Diagnostic criteria for complications of bereavement in the DSM-5. Bereavement Care 33 113–117.
Parkes CM, Weiss RS (1983). Recovery from bereavement. New York: Basic Books.
Prigerson HG, Jacobs SC (2001). Traumatic grief as a distinct disorder: a rationale, consensus criteria, and a preliminary empirical test. In MS Stroebe, RO Hansson, W Stroebe, and H Schut (eds). Handbook of bereavement research. Washington: American Psychological Association. 613–45.
Prigerson HG, Maciejewski PK (2006). A call for sound empirical testing and evaluation of criteria for complicated grief proposed by the DSM V. Omega 52 9–19.
Prigerson HG, Maciejewski PK, Reynolds CF III, et al (1995). Inventory of complicated grief: a scale to measure maladaptive symptoms of loss. Psychiatry Research 59 65–79.
Rogers CR (1980). A way of ageing. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Sanders CM (1993). Risk factors in bereavement outcome. In MS Stroebe, W Stroebe and RO Hansson (eds). Handbook of bereavement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 255–67.
Schut H, Stroebe MS, van den Bout J, de Keijser J (1997). Intervention for the bereaved: gender differences in the efficacy of two counselling programmes. British Journal of Clinical Psychology 36 63–72.
Seligman MEP (1998). Building human strength: psychology's forgotten mission. American Psychological Association Monitor 29 1.
Shapiro ER (2001). Grief in interpersonal perspective: theories and their implications. In MS Stroebe, RO Hansson, W Stroebe, H Schut (eds). Handbook of bereavement research. Washington: American Psychological Association. 301–27.
Shear MK (2010). Complicated grief treatment: the theory, practice and outcomes. Bereavement Care 29(3) 10–14.
Shear MK, Boelen PA, Neimeyer RA (2011). Treating complicated grief – converging approaches. In RA Neimeyer, DL Harris, HR Winokuer, GF Thornton (eds). Grief and bereavement in contemporary society. New York: Routledge. 139–162.
Sim J, Machin L, Bartlam B (2013). Identifying vulnerability in grief: psychometric properties of the Adult Attitude to Grief scale. Quality of Life Research DOI 10.1007/s11136-013-0551-1.
Spitzer RL, Kroenka K, Williams JB, Löwe B (2006). A brief measure for assessing generalised anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Archives of Internal Medicine 166: 1092–1097.
Stroebe M, Schut H (1999). The dual process model of coping with bereavement: rationale and description. Death Studies 23 197–224.
Stroebe M, Schut H (2005–06). Complicated grief: a conceptual analysis of the field. Omega, 52(1): 53–70.
Stroebe W, Stroebe MS (1987). Bereavement and health. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stylianos, SK, Vachon, MLS (1993). The Role of social support in bereavement. In MS Stroebe, W Stroebe, RO Hansson (eds). Handbook of bereavement: theory, research and intervention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 397–410.
Worden JW, Winokuer H (2011). A task-based approach for counseling the bereaved. In RA Neimeyer, DL Harris, HR Winokuer, GF Thornton (eds) Grief and bereavement in contemporary society. New York: Routledge. 57–67.
