Qualitative evaluation of a hospital bereavement service: the perspective of grieving adults
Keywords:
hospital services, adults, support groups, service feedback, tiers of support, revisitingAbstract
AbstractBereavement and grief are natural processes and the majority of people find their way through their loss. However, a small minority may benefit from professional assistance and a service that meets their needs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of an Australian Hospital Bereavement Service on the next of kin of deceased patients. The service provides three consecutive tiers of support to palliative care patients and families including information and compassion, non-specialised bereavement support and specialist intervention referral to external agencies on an individual and selective basis. The research used a qualitative approach with semi-structured focus groups and thematic analysis. Major themes identified were personal experience of grief; revisiting the hospital; and bereavement care experiences. We conclude assumptions should not be made about bereavement needs or grieving reactions of individuals. However, a suite of appropriate bereavement services, support groups and feedback opportunities are perceived as helpful by grieving adults. The research also highlighted how difficult it is for some family members to return to the hospital following the death of their loved one.
References
Aoun SM, Breen LJ, Connor M et al (2012). A public health approach to bereavement support services in palliative care. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 36 14–16.
Bloor M, Wood F (2006). Keywords in qualitative methods: A vocabulary of research concepts. London: SAGE Publications.
Braun V, Clarke V (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psycholog 3 77–101.
Briller SH, Schim SM, Meert KL et al (2007). Special considerations in conducting bereavement focus groups. Omega: Journal of Death and Dying 56 255.
Dominick SA, Irvine AB, Beauchamp N et al (2009). An internet tool to normalize grief. Omega: Journal of Death and Dying 60 71–87.
Forte AL, Hill M, Pazder R et al (2004). Bereavement care interventions: a systematic review. BMC Palliative Care 3 1–14.
Kitzinger J (1994). The methodology of focus groups: the importance of interaction between research participants. Sociology of Health & Illness 16 103–121.
Lautrette A, Darmon M, Megarbane B et al (2007). A communication strategy and brochure for relatives of patients dying in the ICU. New England Journal of Medicine 356 469–478.
Loffe H, Yardley L (2003). Content and thematic analysis. In: DF Marks and L Yardley (eds). Research methods for clinical and health psychology. London: SAGE Publications, 56–69.
Lund D, Caserta M, Utz R et al (2010). Experiences and early coping of bereaved spouses/partners in an intervention based on the dual process model (DPM). Omega: Journal of Death and Dying 61 291–313.
Marks DF, Yardley L (2003). Research methods for clinical and health psychology. London: SAGE Publications.
Minichiello V, Aroni R, Hays T (2008). In-depth interviewing: principles, techniques, analysis. Sydney: Pearson Education Australia.
Morgan DL (1993). Qualitative content analysis: a guide to paths not taken. Qualitative Health Research 3 112–121.
Nagraj S, Barclay S (2011). Bereavement care in primary care: a systematic literature review and narrative synthesis. British Journal of General Practice 61 e42–e48.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) (2011). Quality statement 14: Care after death – bereavement support.
Owen S (2001). The practical, methodological and ethical dilemmas of conducting focus groups with vulnerable clients. Journal of Advanced Nursing 36 652–658.
Poland BD (2001). Transcription quality. In: JF Gubrium, JA Holstein (eds). Handbook of interview research. Thousand Oaks California: SAGE Publications, Inc, 628–650.
Polit DF, Beck CT (2010). Essentials of nursing research: appraising evidence for nursing practice. Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott William & Wilkins.
Renzenbrink I (2002). Foundations of bereavement support in hospice and palliative care. A discussion paper. Remembering the past, living the present, shaping the future. Unpublished discussion paper.
Rolfe G (2006). Validity, trustworthiness and rigour: quality and the idea of qualitative research. Journal of Advanced Nursing 55 304–310.
Schut H, Stroebe M (2011). Challenges in evaluating adult bereavement services. Bereavement Care 30 5–9.
Seymour J, Bellamy G, Gott M et al (2002). Using focus groups to explore older peoples attitudes to end of life care. Ageing and Society 22 517–526.
Stroebe MA, Schut H (1999). The dual process model of coping with bereavement: rationale and description. Death Studies 23(3) 197–224).
Taylor B, Kermode S, Roberts K (2007). Research in nursing and health care: evidence for practice (3rd ed). Melbourne: Thomson.
Tudiver F, Permaul-Woods JA, Hilditch J et al (1995). Do widowers use the health care system differently? Does intervention make a difference? Canadian family physician Médecin de famille canadien 41 392–400.
Vaismoradi M, Turunen H, Bondas T (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing and Health Sciences 15(3) 398–405.
